The Moment of Spell-Breaking
You unroll the mat.
The room smells faintly of incense.
The teacher’s voice is soft, almost ritualistic.
You know this scene.
Even if you’ve never been here before, it feels familiar.
Yoga studios exist in every city, every language, every culture.
There are mats in gyms in São Paulo and Paris, in Tokyo and Toronto.
Yoga is no longer exotic — it is as global as pizza.
You place your palms together.
You step back into plank.
And somewhere in the back of your mind, a picture rises:
ancient India, rishis in ochre robes saluting the dawn, performing these exact movements for thousands of years.
You feel a little solemn, a little proud — you are part of something timeless.
And then the spell breaks.
History leans in, almost kindly, and whispers:
“This beautiful sequence — these planks, these lunges, these flowing vinyasas — are barely a hundred years old.
They were shaped in palace gyms, influenced by wrestling drills and European gymnastics, captured in photographs and printed in manuals so they could spread through schools.
The rishis did not do this. At least, not like this.”
The room suddenly feels different.
The mat beneath you is the same, but the air is not.
Something in you tightens:
If this is not as ancient as you believed, does it still carry the same power?
If the rishis weren’t doing downward dog, then what have you stepped into?
You stay there for a moment, suspended.
Not rejecting the practice — but no longer able to see it with the same innocence.
A door has opened, but you are not yet sure whether you want to step through.
The Shock of History
You step through the door.
The incense is still in the air, but now you see the practice with new eyes.
What we call “yoga” today — the endless flows, the creative vinyasas, the catalogues of hundreds of postures — is a very recent flowering.
The Haṭha Yoga Pradīpikā, one of the most famous medieval manuals of haṭha yoga, was compiled in the 14th or 15th century.
How many asanas does it teach?
Fifteen.
Not fifty, not five hundred — fifteen.
The Gheraṇḍa Saṁhitā (17th–18th century) expands the list to 32.
Even the most encyclopedic medieval texts do not go beyond that number.
And the purpose they give is simple:
-
To make the body stable enough for meditation.
-
To release tension so the prāṇa can flow freely.
-
To keep the body functional and aligned with sādhana.
In the Gorakṣa Saṁhitā, these postures are called pīṭhas — literally, “seats.”
They were meant to be held, not performed as acrobatics.
Patañjali, in the Yoga Sūtras, says it even more simply:
sthira-sukham-āsanam — the posture should be steady and comfortable.
That is the full instruction.
No choreography, no playlists, no sequencing — simply sit, unmoving, at ease.
Which is why the spectacle of today’s vinyasa classes —
bodies flowing through dozens of shapes in constant motion —
would have seemed utterly alien to the yogis of the past.
So where did these hundreds of modern asanas come from?
Scholars like Mark Singleton (Yoga Body), Norman Sjoman (The Yoga Tradition of the Mysore Palace), and James Mallinson (Roots of Yoga) have shown us:
-
Most of the poses we practice today were developed or codified in the late 19th and early 20th centuries.
-
They were shaped by Indian wrestling exercises, Scandinavian and British gymnastics, and the creativity of teachers like Krishnamacharya and his students.
-
Many of them first appeared in palace teaching halls and were then published in illustrated manuals with photographs, which allowed them to spread widely.
This does not make them worthless — it makes them modern creations built on ancient soil.
But it also means that when we step into a yoga class,
we are stepping into something that is one limb of the path, exaggerated to fill the whole sky.
If you thought you were already at the heart of yoga,
this knowledge can feel like a shock — as though someone just told you the temple you entered was only the courtyard.
But this is where the paradox becomes beautiful:
the courtyard is real.
It is sacred.
It is where everyone begins.
But there is more waiting inside —
and the next chapter is about remembering that the practice was never meant to stop at the doorway.
The Narrow Doorway: Āsana as the Third Limb
When the ancient texts spoke of yoga,
they never meant just posture.
They spoke of a path —
a way to turn a human being from distraction toward wholeness,
from scattered effort toward stillness.
Patañjali called it aṣṭāṅga — the eight-limbed path:
-
Yama — non-harming, truthfulness, moderation, the ethics that anchor the mind.
-
Niyama — purity, contentment, discipline, surrender.
-
Āsana — the seat, the stable, comfortable posture of the body.
-
Prāṇāyāma — mastery of the breath, the guiding of life-force.
-
Pratyāhāra — withdrawal of the senses, the quieting of outer distractions.
-
Dhāraṇā — concentration, gathering the mind in one place.
-
Dhyāna — meditation, the effortless stream of attention.
-
Samādhi — absorption, the dropping of the “I” into the infinite.
Āsana is third.
It is not the culmination but the preparation.
Its purpose was never to perform or impress,
but to make the body a silent partner in the inner work to come.
The Haṭha Yoga Pradīpikā even calls asana the foundation —
because without a steady seat, the breath wavers, the senses scatter, the mind refuses to settle.
But no medieval text says: stop here.
And yet the last century — in its hunger for health, for strong bodies, for beautiful shapes —
took this third step and made it the entire staircase.
The doorway became the whole house.
The preparation became the product.
We built an industry around the warm-up.
This is not cause for cynicism — it is cause for clarity.
The mat is still a good place to begin.
The postures still do what they were meant to do:
they release the knots, awaken the prāṇa, teach steadiness.
But they are not the end of the path.
The invitation is not to abandon asana —
but to let it do its real job:
to open the gate to prāṇāyāma, to pratyāhāra, to meditation,
to the quiet fire of yoga where the self dissolves
Kaula Insight Beyond the Limbs
![]() |
| Close-up of Śiva’s face — serene, fierce, and compassionate — the still point beyond all postures, the witness of yoga’s inner union. |
And yet — even beyond this eight-limbed map —
there is a vision still more radical.
For the Kaulas, even the limbs of yoga are not the destination.
They are scaffolding — useful only until the roof is raised.
Abhinavagupta, in the Tantrāloka (4.86), speaks with a clarity that cuts through centuries of ritual accumulation:
evaṃ yogāṅgamiyati tarka eva na cāparam
antarantaḥ parāmarśapāṭavātiśayāya saḥ
“Of all the limbs of yoga, only inquiry (tarka) truly has power —
for it alone leads ever deeper, sharpening the capacity for direct recognition (parāmarśa).”
Here tarka is not dry armchair logic. It is a living blade—the discriminative reflection that belongs to śāktopāya (the mind-based upāya), turning awareness back upon itself again and again until the surface mind thins and parāmarśa—direct, self-luminous recognition—breaks through.
This is where your heart hears Ramana. The kinship is real, but the ladders differ:
-
Abhinava’s tarka: a refined, incisive discrimination (śāktopāya) that uses the mind to cut through the mind, ripening into parāmarśa.
-
Ramana’s vicāra: not discursive analysis at all, but the direct I-ward turn—“Who am I?”—that short-circuits the thought-stream at its source (closer to śambhavopāya in Shaiva terms).
They meet in the same silence; they differ in how they arrive. Say it plainly and without piety: one sharpens the lens until the image drops away; the other puts the lens down and looks from the Heart itself.
Abhinavagupta, 4.87–4.88, then pushes the point without flinching:
ahiṃsā satyam asteya brahmacaryāparigrahāḥ |
iti pañca yamāḥ sākṣāt saṃvittau nopayoginaḥ || 4.87 ||tapaḥ prabhṛtayo ye ca niyamā yattathāsanam |
prāṇāyāmāś ca ye sarvam etad bāhya-vijṛmbhitam || 4.88 ||
“The five yamas and the five niyamas,
as well as āsana and prāṇāyāma,
do not directly touch pure Awareness.
They are outward unfoldings—beautiful, yes, but external.”
This is not contempt; it is right placement. Ethics steadies life. Posture steadies breath. Breath steadies attention. But recognition is another order.
Then the verse of swallowing sun and moon (4.89) opens the inner sky:
citta-pralaya-bandhena pralīne śaśi-bhāskare |
prāpte ca dvādaśe bhāge jīvāditye sva-bodhake || 4.89 ||“When, through the binding power of mental dissolution,
the sun and moon are absorbed into the Heart,
and the last fraction of the soul’s inner radiance is unveiled—
one stands in the fullness of Consciousness itself.”
No performance can take you here. Only the falling in.
Finally, how it is stabilized (4.100):
guru-vākya-parāmarśa-sadṛśe sva-vimarśane |
prabuddhe tad-vipakṣāṇāṃ vyudāsaḥ pāṭha-cintane || 4.100 ||
“When one’s own awareness awakens
through reflection in accord with the Guru’s word,
then through study and contemplation
all opposing tendencies fall away.”
Not moralism. Not acrobatics. A living attunement to the Guru’s pointing, until your own self-recognition stands on its feet and does not wobble.
This is the fierce tenderness at the core of Kaula:
honor the limbs, use them well—then let them go.
Whether by Abhinava’s razor of tarka or Ramana’s naked vicāra, the Current carries you to the same shore: recognition that needs no pose.
The Temple Within
The mat is still there.
The class will go on.
The music will swell, the teacher will cue the next vinyasa,
and you may move through it with the same grace as before —
but something in you has changed.
You now know that what the world calls yoga
is not a window into some frozen Vedic past
but a young, brilliant invention —
a doorway built in the last century.
You know that āsana is the third step, not the whole staircase.
You know that the limbs were meant to prepare you
for something you cannot photograph or post.
And if you have listened deeply,
you know that even these limbs are only scaffolding —
that Abhinava, and Ramana after him,
pointed to a yoga that is not performed but recognized:
the sudden, wordless knowing,
the turning back of attention until nothing remains but the light that sees.
So stay on the mat, if you wish —
but stay differently.
Let the postures soften the body so the breath can steady,
let the breath still the senses,
let the senses fall inward until you find the question waiting:
Who is breathing?
Who is moving?
Who is here?
And when the answer does not come,
but only a silence opens where the question dissolves —
stand still.
You have passed through the courtyard.
You are standing in the temple at last.


No comments:
Post a Comment